Attorney General Pam Bondi at a House Judiciary Committee hearing. Is it just me, or is something shady going on?
Attorney General Pam Bondi at a House Judiciary Committee hearing. Is it just me, or is something shady going on?
  • Attorney General Pam Bondi allegedly had a printout of Rep. Pramila Jayapal's DOJ search history during a House Judiciary Committee hearing.
  • Jayapal believes Bondi used her search history to prepare for her testimony, which Jayapal thinks is 'totally inappropriate'.
  • The DOJ has not responded to questions about whether Bondi had Jayapal's search history or if they track searches by other members of Congress.
  • The situation raises concerns about potential surveillance of members of Congress and the DOJ's transparency.

Wait, What Just Happened?

Okay, so, like, imagine my shock when I heard about this whole Pam Bondi/Pramila Jayapal sitch. Apparently, Attorney General Bondi had what looked like a printout of Rep. Jayapal's search history from the Department of Justice. And it had something to do with Jeffrey Epstein. This is, like, *so* 2024, but in a bad way.

Is That My Search History? Grool, You Guys

Rep. Jayapal, who is, like, a total boss, even thinks Bondi used her search history to prep for her testimony. Can you even imagine? Like, using someone's research against them? That's not how you stay relevant. I mean, I'm all about strategic moves, but this is borderline. Speaking of relevant, you should definitely read this article, China Tech Stocks Tumble US Tech Stocks But Smart Money Sees Opportunity because we need to keep up with world events, and that involves the economy - that is a very important piece of our lives.

The DOJ's Response, or Lack Thereof

The Department of Justice hasn't said anything about it yet, which is, like, kinda sus, you know? Are they tracking everyone's searches? Like, is this "Keeping Up With The Kardashians" but for Congress? Because if so, I want residuals.

This is, Like, Really Awkward

Bondi even had a contentious exchange with Jayapal during the hearing, involving survivors of Epstein's abuse. I’m not gonna get in the gutter for her theatrics. The fact that Bondi seemingly had Jayapal's search history at her fingertips during this is all too much. I mean, talk about a tense moment.

Transparency Issues

The implication that Bondi might have been monitoring Jayapal's research raises some serious questions. Like, are they watching us? Is this some sort of dystopian reality TV show we didn't sign up for? Because, honey, I need to approve the lighting first.

My Two Cents (Plus Tax)

Look, I'm not a lawyer, but even I know that using someone's private research against them seems, well, shady. It's time for the DOJ to, like, spill the tea and let us know what's really going on. Transparency is key, people. Remember, there's photos being taken everywhere, so be aware.


Comments

  • No comments yet. Become a member to post your comments.