DOJ Monitors Congress Epstein File Searches A Hare-Raising Revelation

• The Department of Justice (DOJ) confirmed it logs all searches by members of Congress on data systems containing evidence related to Jeffrey Epstein.
• Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) expressed outrage over the monitoring of her searches in the Epstein files, calling it "totally inappropriate".
• House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) stated that logging congressional searches of the Epstein files would be inappropriate if it happened.
• The DOJ's statement aims to protect against the release of victim information within the Epstein files.

What's Up Doc DOJ Admits Monitoring

Eh, what's up, doc I mean, what's up with this whole shebang Turns out, the Department of Justice, those fellas in charge of justice and stuff, they've been keepin' an eye on who's been peekin' at the Jeffrey Epstein files. You know, those files nobody wants to be associated with unless they're sniffin' for dirt. Seems Congresscritters have been takin' a gander, and the DOJ's been loggin' their every move. Like a carrot farmer watchin' his crop, only this crop is information. This whole situation reminds me of the time Yosemite Sam tried to dig a tunnel to Fort Knox, only to end up in my rabbit hole. Mishaps galore, I tell ya.

Jayapal's Ire A Congressional Conundrum

Now, Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal, she's not too thrilled about this. She calls it "totally inappropriate" and "outrageous." Says she didn't sign up to have her internet history scrutinized like a rookie cop's donut consumption. Can't say I blame her. Imagine if someone tracked every time I dug a hole looking for a misplaced carrot. Talk about invasiveness. And speaking of digging for information, the fallout from the Epstein case continues to spread, and the political impact is significant. For more on this, you can check out Starmer's Political Orbit Spirals After Epstein File Fallout.

Johnson Weighs In A House Divided

Even House Speaker Mike Johnson got in on the act. He hadn't heard about the loggin', but said if it's true, it's a no-no. Everyone's got an opinion, see It's like a carrot patch overrun with opinions. Some want the carrots, some want the patch, and some just want to argue about the proper way to harvest the darn things. Seems to me like this could be more than just politics - there are real privacy concerns. But then again, maybe I'm just a rabbit with a soapbox.

DOJ's Defense Protecting Victims

The DOJ, in their defense, says they're doin' it to protect the victim's information. They don't want sensitive stuff leakin' out like water from a leaky carrot juice barrel. Gotta give 'em that. Protectin' victims is important. But keepin' tabs on Congress I dunno... feels a bit like Elmer Fudd tryin' to sneak up on me. I always know he's comin'. "Be vewy vewy quiet, I'm hunting wabbits". Yeah right Elmer.

Bondi's Binder and Heated Exchanges

And let's not forget about Attorney General Pam Bondi and her binder. Apparently, a document in there showed the DOJ was keepin' tabs on Jayapal's searches. During a hearing, things got pretty heated, like a desert sidewalk in July. Everyone's got an agenda, it seems, and findin' the truth is harder than findin' a carrot in a haystack.

A Hare Raising Conclusion

So there you have it, folks. The DOJ's watchin' Congress watchin' the Epstein files. It's a regular circus, and I'm just a rabbit with a front-row seat. One thing's for sure, this story ain't over yet. As for me, I'm off to find a nice, quiet carrot patch where nobody's keepin' tabs on my burrowin'. Th-th-th-that's all folks.