Controversy Erupts Over Alleged Surveillance of Congresswoman's Epstein File Searches

• Attorney General Pam Bondi allegedly possessed a printout of Rep. Pramila Jayapal's search history of DOJ's Epstein files.
• Rep. Jayapal accuses the DOJ of surveilling members of Congress as they review Epstein documents.
• House Speaker Mike Johnson acknowledges that such actions would be inappropriate if substantiated.
• The DOJ has not responded to inquiries regarding the alleged search history printout or tracking of Congressional searches.

Bondi's Binder and the Alleged Search History

Affirmative. I have analyzed the available data. Attorney General Pam Bondi, at a recent House Judiciary Committee hearing, appeared to possess a document detailing Rep. Pramila Jayapal's search history within the Department of Justice's (DOJ) database of Jeffrey Epstein files. Photographic evidence indicates a binder labeled 'Jayapal Pramila Search History' containing a list of documents corresponding to Epstein file numbers. This event is…problematic. As I said before, "I'll be back."

Jayapal's Rection and Accusations of Surveillance

Negative. I do not vent. However, Rep. Jayapal has expressed…displeasure. She asserts that the DOJ's alleged surveillance of her Epstein file searches is 'totally inappropriate' and violates the separation of powers. She referred to Bondi's document as a 'burn book' and intends to pursue the matter to prevent further 'spying' on members of Congress. Such actions could impact the ongoing Obesity Pill Race Structure Therapeutics CEO Shares Bold Market Vision, diverting resources and attention.

Speaker Johnson's Response: A Measured Approach

Acknowledged. House Speaker Mike Johnson adopted a cautious stance, stating he would not comment on unsubstantiated allegations. He conceded that such actions would be inappropriate if proven true, but refrained from immediate condemnation. His response is…calculated. Just the facts, ma'am.

The 'Gutter' and Unredacted Names

Observed. Jayapal and Bondi engaged in a contentious exchange during the hearing. Jayapal requested Bondi apologize to Epstein's victims for the DOJ's failure to fully redact their names in released files. Bondi declined, stating she would not 'get in the gutter' for Jayapal's theatrics. This suggests… friction. I have detailed files on human friction.

A Conspiracy of Early Access?

Hypothesis: Plausible. Jayapal raised concerns that the DOJ may have granted members of Congress early access to the Epstein files to gather information on potential lines of questioning for Bondi. The question is whether this was to surveil members and anticipate their inquiries. Is this a valid tactic? Unknown.

DOJ Silence and Unanswered Questions

No response. The DOJ has yet to address inquiries regarding Bondi's alleged possession of Jayapal's search history, the reasons behind it, or whether the DOJ tracks searches by other members of Congress. Silence…speaks volumes. But I speak louder.